tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post1421339993219002344..comments2024-01-25T22:12:21.504+08:00Comments on Inhuman Resources: Dissimilarity attractionC.M.http://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-68251583172382418712010-05-07T18:47:37.126+08:002010-05-07T18:47:37.126+08:00總之... 總之... 咁囉。總之... 總之... 咁囉。C.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-10372804628276348532010-05-07T00:51:10.695+08:002010-05-07T00:51:10.695+08:00>總之...
總之就主動嘅又㗳你糖,被動嘅又㗳你糖喺喇。
>總之我(暫時)都頂得順!...>總之...<br /><br />總之就主動嘅又㗳你糖,被動嘅又㗳你糖喺喇。<br /><br />>總之我(暫時)都頂得順!<br /><br />点止吖,重好enjoy果種似有還無嘅曖昧添;)<br /><br />>會係何等滋味...<br /><br />我点會唔知吖?你當我孿嘅咩!<br /><br />講開又講,當年查實喺咪比小狐狸知道咗你同隻大狐狸有啲曖昧所以嬲咗你吖?p.e.t.e.r.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-40903317604605242392010-05-06T18:49:12.704+08:002010-05-06T18:49:12.704+08:00查實,佢咪就係林志玲囉!
(噢畸噢畸... )
拿,以下一切純屬推斷,一切言論及態度,並不構成任...查實,佢咪就係林志玲囉!<br /><br />(噢畸噢畸... )<br /><br />拿,以下一切純屬推斷,一切言論及態度,並不構成任何追女的要約或引導。<br /><br />咁講,阿靚女呢,佢可能讀過NLP,所以就(亂咁)搵人試下遮。又,佢家陣響疑似PR firm 做,所以習慣左遮。又又,唔知佢真傻定假蠢,定係我地班男同學敏感,總之... 唏!又又又,就係你個答案勒:佢當我地班麻甩佬個個都賤格+變態+虛偽既!咁佢自己先至justify到佢個理性選擇嘛(呢個都係旁人斷估)。<br /><br />又又又又,佢係小狐狸之外第二個可怕既女人。(不過小狐狸係被動地可怕,呢個係主動地可怕...)<br /><br />>>否則,以你成晒精嘅道行,冇理由呢D咁粗淺嘅道理,你會睇唔穿?<br /><br />你唔好理!總之我(暫時)都頂得順!不過我亦會好聰明同理性咁,唔會嘗試去挑戰自己底線既!<br /><br />又又又又又,一早就話個theory對果亭超critical(即係你)無用架啦。太醒喇你,唔會明白我地呢亭凡夫俗子,對住阿靚女(個真身)會係何等滋味...。C.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-67160809648906178822010-05-06T18:16:42.104+08:002010-05-06T18:16:42.104+08:00越喺溫柔打起嚟先越狠吖!越喺溫柔打起嚟先越狠吖!p.e.t.e.r.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-49458379645059140492010-05-06T18:12:50.740+08:002010-05-06T18:12:50.740+08:00我咁溫柔,唔打人架!我咁溫柔,唔打人架!xiao zhuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03287426495158084726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-15605759718403939852010-05-06T18:06:50.323+08:002010-05-06T18:06:50.323+08:00再唔坦白就人襟住你比小豬打蘿pat再唔坦白就人襟住你比小豬打蘿patp.e.t.e.r.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-2354413982619684552010-05-06T17:47:43.799+08:002010-05-06T17:47:43.799+08:00(我覺得比人襟住黎打囉。)(我覺得比人襟住黎打囉。)C.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-75526157749754327892010-05-06T17:43:44.324+08:002010-05-06T17:43:44.324+08:00佢咩吖?....你喺咪想話扮豬食靚女吖?佢咩吖?....你喺咪想話扮豬食靚女吖?p.e.t.e.r.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-43489813593986595932010-05-06T17:37:21.988+08:002010-05-06T17:37:21.988+08:00>>以你成晒精嘅道行,冇理由呢D咁粗淺嘅道理,你會睇唔穿㗎?
p.e.t.e.r.,佢...>>以你成晒精嘅道行,冇理由呢D咁粗淺嘅道理,你會睇唔穿㗎?<br /><br />p.e.t.e.r.,佢點會睇唔穿吖!佢...嘿嘿嘿!xiao zhuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03287426495158084726noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-38478770669328166282010-05-06T17:14:07.501+08:002010-05-06T17:14:07.501+08:00apply果個圖表化落"小豺狠昅唔昅靚女舊女同學" (i.e.男人望唔望女人)呢...apply果個圖表化落"小豺狠昅唔昅靚女舊女同學" (i.e.男人望唔望女人)呢個topic度:<br /><br />咦?"小豺狠昅唔昅靚女舊女同學"<---唔見咗嘅?p.e.t.e.r.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-62725207741901612052010-05-06T17:09:53.197+08:002010-05-06T17:09:53.197+08:00>靚到呢,連廿零歲後生仔都嗒糖
講多無謂,快D整張相嚟睇吓先。冇相,你話豬扒喺林志玲都得㗎喇。...>靚到呢,連廿零歲後生仔都嗒糖<br />講多無謂,快D整張相嚟睇吓先。冇相,你話豬扒喺林志玲都得㗎喇。<br /><br />>蠢既靚女...不過我同佢過唔到電,想呃都呃唔落手。<br />喂,聽講你一早已經disqualified咗喇喎。<br />再講,佢真喺蠢的話,比你呃到你都喊三聲喇。<br />又再講,如果你又轉軚覺得佢唔蠢(真喺一個聰明嘅靚女的話),咁點解你冇喺個post度表示揼心呢?嘿嘿...一定有"烔梗"。<br /><br />>例如<b>你</b>可能覺得<b>滿足唔到我</b><br /><br />哇哈哈哈~ 原來佢講咁多廢話就喺想講呢句<b>「你...滿足唔到我</b>!」<br />嗱!老老實實喇,你衰邊飯瓣先?(極力忍笑中)<br /><br />>similarity/dissimilarity attraction<br /><br />點解我話廢話呢?因為呢類theory喺以成敗論英雄--點講都講得通,完全subject to個circumstances同理睇吓你想用邊個角度去justify你個argument.<br />e.g.<br />apply果個"圖表化"落 (i.e.男人望唔望女人)呢個topic度:<br />直-Similarity(昅)Disimilarity(唔昅);<br />橫-Instinctive(本能)Cognetive(理智)<br /><br />1.昅+本能=賤格 / 誠實<br />2.昅+理智=變態 / 欣賞<br />3.唔昅+本能=基佬 / 君子<br />4.唔昅+理智=虚偽 / 自制<br /><br />即喺咁,我唔喺好覺得呢D theory有乜價值囉。等於一個人要講某D道理,實有啱用嘅成語吖,歴史故事咁。不過究竟果D原因喺藉口/煙幕定事實之全部又喺另一回事。<br /><br />所以,與其講D冇乜義意嘅嘢,不如你快D整張相上嚟同埋講吓你當年究竟衰邊瓣,睇吓仲有冇得救仲好喇。嘻嘻~ <br /><br />又,我覺得佢今次同你嘅"約會"中,佢其實喺度強烈地表達緊"等"你嘅幽怨囉。Exact~~ly就喺果隻"個口越say no 就越令人say yes"。之所以:<br />1.明明喺你話唔過佢電,佢偏偏就要講到好似喺佢唔要你咁,<br />2.又怪你「我可以話你知,其實係你...唔望我身體其他部分,以免...受到我...所吸引...」<br />唔通咁你都收唔到?可見你雖然冇正眼望佢,不過下意識中,你已經將佢裏裏外外昅得通通透透,所以搞到你一早已經迷迷糊糊。否則,以你成晒精嘅道行,冇理由呢D咁粗淺嘅道理,你會睇唔穿㗎?<br /><br />嗯....吖!!!!莫非佢....佢....就喺傳說中大名頂頂嘅小狐貍?嗯...似喇,唔喺嘅話上面就唔會又喺度大讚人靚女但又唔表示揼心喇。p.e.t.e.r.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-83023506044616641682010-05-06T15:41:40.292+08:002010-05-06T15:41:40.292+08:00怪佢過分美麗,小心奶野呀!怪佢過分美麗,小心奶野呀!C.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-62168636041455996162010-05-06T14:56:44.348+08:002010-05-06T14:56:44.348+08:00佢話家陣唔識點分咩係男朋友,點分咩唔係喎。
>>>>嘩, 快d介紹我識 !!...佢話家陣唔識點分咩係男朋友,點分咩唔係喎。<br />>>>>嘩, 快d介紹我識 !! kaka篤篤篤撐https://www.blogger.com/profile/05359701414730104570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-11348768670274605802010-05-06T13:48:11.797+08:002010-05-06T13:48:11.797+08:00牛牛:
唔新啦,只係我未講過咁咋。
********
Icarus:
好耐無見,先將阿靚女講...牛牛:<br /><br />唔新啦,只係我未講過咁咋。<br /><br />********<br /><br />Icarus:<br /><br />好耐無見,先將阿靚女講既野<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_I8QYO_Pa95k/S-JSM3c503I/AAAAAAAAAcw/eojVnaUqfxA/s1600/Similarity.jpg" rel="nofollow">圖表化</a>先。<br /><br />先提一個例子:Sex similarity.<br /><br />表面上,係opposite attracts,但如果有記得到幾個keywords:青春期、Growth,我估大致上就會理解到,男女opposite attracts 除左係生理反應(hormonal),亦係成長期積聚返黎既經驗(唔知爭仔爭女,仲有社會/文化經驗)。而我覺得,後者(即cognitive)更有影響力,強化opposite attracts。<br /><br />好勒,再refer to 你個問題 —— 梗係會有可能喇。<br /><br />用番阿靚女個 theory, threat如果係similarity導致既,好大因素會來自「理性思考」,例如好似你所講,有利益衝突,威脅到佢個地位。如果上司因為你打golf係會令佢有threat,我諗原因唔係出自打golf比佢叻,而係佢打18洞,你打driving range!<br /><br />遮又可以咁講,或者呢類威脅都可以係「instinctive」既。蝦,呢個等我再約阿靚女出黎食晚飯問清楚先。<br /><br />又又,similarity/dissimilarity attraction,我覺得,好多時都係好唔理性既,對住比較(講求)理性既人,或者比較critical既人,碰釘子既機會都唔細。C.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-91116537347224560802010-05-05T23:22:38.994+08:002010-05-05T23:22:38.994+08:00但假如similarity令佢覺得有threat呢? 會唔會有日你同佢有利益衝突, 甚至你威脅到佢個...但假如similarity令佢覺得有threat呢? 會唔會有日你同佢有利益衝突, 甚至你威脅到佢個地位? 甚至或者無利益衝突, 純粹你打golf打得好過佢?Icarus Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05569153168790250307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-59925662620815760632010-05-05T20:15:33.420+08:002010-05-05T20:15:33.420+08:00哗!CM,搞边科呵?咁有新意!哗!CM,搞边科呵?咁有新意!HollyCowhttp://hollycowplanet.spaces.live.com/default.aspxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-77652592994794128482010-05-05T17:40:40.400+08:002010-05-05T17:40:40.400+08:00我呢個靚女舊同學,雖則無林志玲咁閃,但笑得一樣咁迷人。(身材唔知,唔敢正眼望)
備案嘛... er...我呢個靚女舊同學,雖則無林志玲咁閃,但笑得一樣咁迷人。(身材唔知,唔敢正眼望)<br /><br />備案嘛... errrr... 似有還無囉。C.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-84972768366707132222010-05-05T17:17:56.229+08:002010-05-05T17:17:56.229+08:00如果保養適宜,呢個年代既中女都可以引到不少八十後既。
至少志玲都仲索過stephy掛。
同靚女舊同...如果保養適宜,呢個年代既中女都可以引到不少八十後既。<br />至少志玲都仲索過stephy掛。<br /><br />同靚女舊同學食飯,有冇向大sir備左案先?哈哈。Terence Yunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07434962937499120315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-38374642924613815522010-05-05T15:05:58.057+08:002010-05-05T15:05:58.057+08:00總之好似比鬼迷一樣,唔記得曬,醒左之後淨係隱約感覺到呢個靚女唔簡單(同你一樣)。總之好似比鬼迷一樣,唔記得曬,醒左之後淨係隱約感覺到呢個靚女唔簡單(同你一樣)。C.M.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10020937080260646187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37862247.post-3158756908605415422010-05-05T14:57:44.711+08:002010-05-05T14:57:44.711+08:00NLP 課程裏面係有講過有d人個口越say no 就越令人say yes但就要搭埋前文後理同Body...NLP 課程裏面係有講過有d人個口越say no 就越令人say yes但就要搭埋前文後理同Body Language一齊來分析囉!<br /><br />廿零歲後生仔真係幾嗒我糖喎(好認真咁講)Hanahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08878494751658888832noreply@blogger.com