Tuesday, July 22, 2008

無獎競猜遊戲 2

問題1:

點解我咁忙呢?

問題2:

究竟做人 specialized 好d,定係 generalized 好d呢?

33 comments:

xiao zhu said...

1.係唔係要恭喜呀?

2.咁要睇吓呢個人係邊個喇。你呀...

南區肥龍 said...

1. 嗯...因為你又出競猜遊戲囉.

2. 兩樣都好...不過你都係專心啲啦.

恭喜哂!

dog o said...

1. 你忙故你在

2. 平衡先決

Karen (Sze) said...

1. 點解我咁忙呢?
答:
a)家有喜事囉(快o左一個星期?真係恭喜晒)!講緊準備有新成員加入囉!
b)趕住考試同完成論文畢業囉!
c)忙住答我們的feedback(七十+肥龍+我都足以令您要寫埋下集)。

2. 究竟做人 specialized 好d,定係 generalized 好d呢?

論工作, specialized較好, 但若然本身係generalized 的話, 叫做樣樣都識d, 人家都唔敢"恰"您; 論做人, 無o野十全十美, 當您想specialized時, 現實係要您generalized。

Be balance.

Karen (Sze) said...

補充我的意思:

當您本身係多重身份時(generalize), 先平衡其重要性, 然後專心做好一件事或者一個task(specialized)。

易過借火 said...

答小肥狼:

1.能者多勞/天將降大任於斯人也....

2.睇情況喇...(下刪百零字)

C.M. said...

小珠:

1. 唔洗客氣

2. 我咩壓!

C.M. said...

龍兄:

1. 咪係囉

2. 咁專心有專心既好

咁客氣呀

C.M. said...

On兄:

1. 我忘故我在

2. 你點話點好喇

C.M. said...

Karen:

1a) 嘩!
1b) 嘿!
1c) 唉...

2. 哦。先generalize後specialize丫嘛

C.M. said...

易借難還:

1. 斯人將步肥狼後塵也

2. 個情況話都係specialize好d喎... (下刪數十字)

VC said...

1)因為你不"忽略""不重要"的"小o野"。

2)generalized.

s-pig said...

來遲了
我都恭喜你!!

工作上,專同博都重要
但係你個問題係做人喎...
咁...相對地,我認為博比專重要d

Geoffrey Kong 江貴為 said...

1)你成日都咁忙ga啦!

2)份工越做得耐,做得高級,就要既專(喺自己範疇要識得多),又要通(乜都要識D),如果唔係做人點解越嚟越辛苦!

seikomatic said...

(1) 典解?典解要問典解,因為忙。如果唔忙就唔駛問典解。忙相對於昨日還是後日,相對於嘆住空調座房果位定睇緊叫下午茶果位?得閑林下咩叫忙你其實忙極有限。

(2) 專定博?

俺講一個故事你聽,從前有條湯牛既,湯左幾廿年,游刃於肌理間閉目未傷一腱,有條口水佬教人刨丁解牛道理話可以安心,納命,侍主、用下、得道、升天....咁你話邊位勁d呢?

專於湯牛又唔可得道升天,博於援引又唔懂湯牛。世上豈有善湯牛之智者,若有,下品而矣,中善專萬技而博萬理,上善無專亦無博:覺者,佛也。

bravo said...

博萬技 Less than 博萬理Less than 專萬技 Less than 專萬理 Less than 專萬技而博萬理

my thought only (no back up), what do you think?

What do you think?

Bravo

C.M. said...

VC:

1. 我死頂遮(多謝)

2. 直截了當,我鍾意

C.M. said...

Pig妹:

哈哈多謝(嗚嗚,真係值得多謝?)

嗯,點解重要d呢?

C.M. said...

江兄:

1) 咪係!都係自己攞黎(拿,你唔好學呀)

2) 唉,份工,我似係越做得耐,越低級咁囉。

C.M. said...

精工:

(1) Bingo!典解要問典解?咪就係你話齋,忙極有限囉。

(2) 哦,原來你講緊mastery beyond unconsciously competent...

C.M. said...

Bravo,

In terms of population distribution, it seems you got your point.

BTW, are...

博萬技 = the Fathers?
博萬理 = the Politicians?
專萬技 = the Scientists?
專萬理 = the Wives(and husbands)?
專萬技而博萬理 = the Mothers?

005 said...

1. ..........

2. 你出個問題已經俾左個答案你啦....點解? 你條問題出得咁 "generalized" , 唔該出得 "specialized" 一 D 都得掛.

余若虛 said...

1.無事忙,好忙好忙,哈哈

2.可唔可以貪心d,兩者兼得?

Geoffrey Kong 江貴為 said...

專萬技 = the Scientists?
我覺得我哋頂多都係專幾技,好多都祇係專一、兩技咋。

C.M. said...

1. *_^

2. 鎖你鎖你。冇下次。

C.M. said...

若虛兄:

1. 前者你講緊我,後者講緊你自己?

2. 得!兩年前我係specialized既,今日就generalized囉。

C.M. said...

江兄:

哈哈,你見到唔見到呀?係Scientists,唔係Scientist呀!(XD)

bravo said...

CM:

I like your application of the no-back-up theory.

Here is one of my funny version applications.
博萬技 = husbands
博萬理 = wives
專萬技 = professionals (those 4 C)
專萬理 = scientists
專萬技而博萬理 = Mothers

:D

Bravo

C.M. said...

Bravo:

Haha, do you see that in my proposition, fathers are less than mothers and in yours, husbands are less than wives?

Hehe, what do you think?

*_^

bravo said...

CM:

We can't help since they are 博萬理 ma

a little bit sound like 萬理望添, A也

C.M. said...

Bravo:

Um... yeah we can't help. From the biological point of view, isn't the principal reason for mothers > fathers because fathers are often more forgetful of how many kids they "should" have?

bravo said...

CM:

Oh that's for sure. Fathers got more "soldiers", so it is understandable that they are more forgetful. ... Mothers got mostly one, sometimes two, rarely three "soldiers", so Mothers are less forgetful and bigger from the start, hehe :P

C.M. said...

Soldiers! XD

Let's charge!