佢上司
我等待
次次印 report 都要雙面，點解唔一次過 set 個 printer 印雙面？
次次計同一條數都用計數機，點解唔 set 條 formula 落 Excel？
次次搵 file 都咁耐，點解 filename 唔改用年月日？
次次都印埋d 空白頁，點解唔整左 page setup 先？
次次成注香就黎燒曬先至話趕，點解唔等老闆放埋狗先至黎搵我？
次次我決定左你先郁，點解我個 job title 唔係你上司？
次次出糧我都覺得自己 over-paid，點解我又唔出聲話 paid 多左？
人期待
同事話，寧願見到上司，收到佢份功課，會有個反應，就算係一句「下？仲黎？」又或者「個客係咪咁多野呀」... 甚至係「正，又有報價要做！」或者「乜咁煩架，又要報價...」
佢最憎聽到佢答「點都要做架啦...」或者係「咪又係要做...」，甚至係「是但喇，做又得，唔做又得」... 又或者「你鍾意喇！」。
佢問我，究竟係佢無情，定係上司無情？
++++++++++
曾經有條友曾幾何時都話過幾服佢上司，但依家.... Errr.... 點解大家都變左咁Q多？
有冇筍工介紹？
26 comments:
聘請【老細】
大學畢業，隨和好學，勤奮上進，具組織能力，克苦耐勞，堅忍精進尤佳，具相關作經驗優先。辛高糧好，保障無敵人多。
"(1) The "Prospects" (thing) is one of the most powerful motivators for your blue-chips-driven staff. When a staff is unable to understand thoroughly how your business develops, they would consider that prospect doesn't exist even though you are full of confidence with your plans. When they cannot see through the mist and somehow find another picturesque scenery, your efforts are going futile.
For family businesses, staff exits for better prospects because for most of the time, they DON'T know what prospects they are having. They do have a prospect, but family "members" selectively (though not on purpose) choose what prospects to be told."
C.M.兄，不知為何，當時未有讀到這個reply，多數是身邊有大事發生了，回神後忘記了，要apologize.
以上是全部同意。Ordinary people think concretely and has myopic thinking, pretty hard for the becoming leader (or entrepreneur) to instill the vision into the to-be-Mr.Fok given a small renumeration and lack of guaranteed prospect of blue-chip company (although in reality it may be turn into a real prospect later, as long as the employee believe for several years, it suffices).
To screen for self-motivated/self-actualizating (not auto-motivated) employee is not impossible, but need a different skill-set from the interviewer(or the employer). And then after hiring them, can the employer really self-actualize with the employee together, i.e. is the boss a true leader? If not, it is better not to disappoint the employee, right?
To Seiko,
大學++畢業，隨和好學，勤奮上進，具組織能力，克苦耐勞，堅忍精進尤佳，具相關作經驗優先。plus vision, but not yet 辛高糧好，
保障是有齊以上老細領導發展，及把你的長處發揮，短處減少，有興趣乎？
如果唔係o甘, 就唔係上司,
曾經服過佢, e+唔再服佢, very simple, 係因為你進步左....
>>次次出糧我都覺得自己 over-paid，點解我又唔出聲話 paid 多左？
我鍾意呢句!
我仲真係出過聲添!
之前日日想自殺，今日想殺人！
（再講）
晶晶：
唔該曬。廣告費收順d丫。
Nic Hing:
覆you later.
篤撐兄：
Errr... 查實條友仲退步左，係佢上司真係變左，由主動變得被動、怕事、樣樣怕。
新奇士男：
以我工作態度，絕對over-paid。但加埋上司對我既工作態度，嘿。（係，條友係為左五斗米折腰）
Bravo:
唔洗apologize喎。我要apologize至真，我對上上上果篇我都未落筆。 @_@
＞＞Ordinary people think concretely and has myopic thinking, ...given a small renumeration and lack of guaranteed prospect of blue-chip company ...
Haha, it's really ordinary.
＞＞To screen for self-motivated/self-actualizating (not auto-motivated) employee is not impossible, but need a different skill-set from the interviewer(or the employer) And then after hiring them...
Yeah. Intrinsically motivated people are not scarce. But somehow we have so common here is a division of recruitment functions from managing people. Even the interviewer (recruiter) may identify a self-actualized, the manager (boss) may "never" understand how to keep the momentum going. The most difficult part for both the recruiter and the boss is, I guess, what the "source" of (intrinsic) motivation of the employee is. Businesses solely with "financial goals" may supply little of this kind of motivation. Don't you think so?
Auto-motivation (a.k.a. self-motivation in HK) is big joke in our field. I often hesitate to apply for these jobs. (you can imagine how harsh can such future boss be?!)
C.M. hing,
Businesses solely with "financial goals" may supply little of this kind of motivation. Don't you think so?--> That is true for most business in HK - lack of innovation.
For me, I basically won't directly target at money when I try to make profit. I target at innovation, measure it by the amount of profit it receives. So self-actualization come from the innovation part. e.g. development of a "cure" of autism etc. is an innovation - here is the self-actualization part, profit will come as a secondary reward, or as an objective measure of how well you innovate & serve people/needy better (self-actualize). Need to be profitable to refuel the research & development (innovation). Pragmatically idealistic, so to speak.
P.S. how well-thought to manage the roll-out, marketing, human resource in order to make the core innovation work (cure of autism) is also an integral part of the innovation. Cheers.
各位小心喇! 阿哥去殺人！
>>(頭五個)次次...
好簡單: 如果唔咁做, 老闆會覺得自己好無用, 唔識點佢下屬做o野, 亦唔顯示下屬(及您)的英明神武聰明才智。
明無?
>>(後兩個)次次...
幾意氣難平, 都依家都係咁。
>>點解我個 job title 唔係你上司
當我上年不幸地遇到呢d"人間極品", 就有這樣的感嘆。
上年勁火滾, 90%同佢有關; 見佢前面直頭想打佢後面, 對佢幾冷淡之餘, 間唔中仲用言語"車"佢; 依家, 佢做緊的同事同樣唔係好睬佢。
我諗我係無情的。
以我工作態度，同樣over-paid; 今年續約, 老闆話: 今年要凍薪。
>>有冇筍工介紹？
我公司幫唔到您, sorry。
我遇過最難頂的上司是:
1. 無料;
2. 無膽;
3.每份繁/簡的工作,要你為她想對策.
4.又沒信心採納下屬的意見, 於是要你準備好PLAN A,B,C,D,E
4.交貨時, 她再妳在2小時內, 為PLAN A-E準備CONTINGENCY PLAN各二.
5. 最後, 她竟然全盤推翻所有PLAN, 然後又用你最初所提議的方案.
跟著這些老闆, 命也短幾年. 我寧願做埋她的工作, 不必做來做去浪費時間.
好彩, 跟了一輪之後, 我要生孩子, 放完產假便轉老闆了.
Nic Hing,
Innovation and self-actualization. These two words plunged me into days of thoughts.
Arha, got what you meant. The bell rang again: Nishibori's. I would say, self-motivation comes from the nature of work (umm... or from the person who chooses what to work?)
Innovation for/and autism. Love this idea very much. Good hunting! (I wish I could open a new post for this.)
>曾經有條友曾幾何時都話過幾服佢上司，但依家.... Errr.... 點解大家都變左咁Q多？
人有悲歡離合，可能你係時候靜極思動喇
Karen:
＞＞(頭五個)次次...
好野播（係咪唔係「五」，而係「四」？）。睇到我講頭四次同後面三次分開喎。（頭果四次呢，係真係想轉過頭讚自己架）
＞＞幾意氣難平, （我？）都依家都係咁。
你都係咁... 慘？
＞＞人間極品
咁緊要？
C.M. Hing,
Innovation for a cure of autism etc to be well-accepted by the general public... (non-exist yet in terms of both expertise and vision, hence need innovation) will have immense social value under the framework of capitalism but it is against the status quo from EVERY PARTICIPANTS currently in this special circle.
Self-actualization has never been an easy job because the innovation itself does not have a place in people's mind, in fact it is a black swan people tends to reject, as before people can do the paradigm shift they can't "see" it. Hard to see the black spot on a piece of white paper until they dim the light and soften their views.
So apart from the core innovation of the cure, how to bring about the paradigm shift is also an integral part of the innovation project itself.
A bit like how Chrissie breaks into the conservative mind of HK people. Such a good marketing plan can merely receive about 2 (Against):1 (For) votes in SINA's poll.
8-)
富媽媽：
歡迎歡迎（在職媽媽的魄力，小弟羡慕非常）
你呢個老闆真係好難啃！果條友個老闆幾乎都想係咁，差在無前後5x3個plans咁多（魚），但又好彩佢易轉舦，果條友一話：咁會差爆個client喎... 咁就即刻收回成命。（最嘿人憎既timesheet都有返少許利用價值）
p.e.t.e.r.：
你講中左，真係好靜。足足靜左兩年。
以關係講，佢對我真係唔差，我對佢亦算咁。但我衰在怕靜。
Nic Hing,
Great to see you have a plan!
＞＞...innovation itself does not have a place in people's mind, in fact it is a black swan people tends to reject...
Sure do.
＞＞...as before people can do the paradigm shift they can't "see" it.
Umm...
＞＞A bit like how Chrissie breaks into the conservative mind of HK people.
That's interesting. Somehow I thought is not totally the credits of marketing plan, but change in social values, perhaps. (No strong view)
都無什麼計劃呢，摸石過河，見步行步罷inno or not 睇怎樣看。
Chrissie單野我覺得很有趣。C.M.兄指social value可能有些轉變…你當吹吓水睇，可能變咗什麼value呢？
吹水咁睇...
1. 性解放
2. 社會藝術鑑賞能力提升
3. 情感麻木（犬儒/碎料/un 勁既仲有）
4. If you can't beat them, join them
5. 法治精神深入民心
社會藝術鑑賞能力提升 I like this one.
法治精神深入民心 you mean...? facebook active group?
法治精神深入民心...
車，Chrissie (alike) 又冇犯法，搵食啫。
C.M.兄，這單嘢有趣的地方很多。又有熱狗吃，又有得內部認講pillows。這麽關「懷」員工，要叫某上司學習學習嗯:)innovation vs status quo 真實Chrissie與表面Angelababy的角力。ego 與 superego 的比拼
What a carnival!
Nic,
突然想起一字：
朝聖式趁墟。
Post a Comment